Most common ide for r
Many authors tend to cite the reason that “this has never been studied before” to explain why their paper is significant. One of America’s leading newspapers, the New York Times, recognized the truth that “journal editors typically prefer to publish groundbreaking new research.” 14 Academic journals are constantly on the lookout for research that is exciting and fresh. Results that have no clinical, theoretical, or practical implications Results that are unoriginal, predictable, or trivialĦ. Studies that report already known knowledge but positions the knowledge as novel by extending it to a new geography, population, or cultural settingĥ. Secondary analyses that extend or replicate published findings without adding substantial knowledgeĤ.
Use of methods that have become obsolete because of new technologies or techniquesģ. Lack of originality, novelty, or significanceĢ. Listed below are the most common rejection reasons cited in these studies. Even researchers at the top of their field have experienced rejection. Several peer-reviewed studies have investigated the reasons that journals reject papers. Rejection is the norm in academic publishing.